Eccentric and rich, Frederick Loren and his wife Annabelle invite five strangers (chosen for their unique needs or greed) to spend a night in a haunted mansion for $10,000. They arrive and are told of the various murders that have occurred in the house.
As they seem to face ghosts, eventually there is a murder, causing tensions to run high as nobody knows who they can trust and find they must wait out the night. Is the house truly haunted, as caretaker Pritchard claims? Or is it an elaborate ruse always meant to end in murder?
The opening is a bit clunky due to it devoting it’s time to two talking heads providing exposition. One of those is Pritchard, who provides the same information to everyone at the party, making his sequence wholly unnecessary.
However, once the story begins, it is full of engaging twists and turns. House on Haunted Hill suggests there are no actual ghosts, though Pritchard insists that there are.
Of course, Price, with his campy and creepy style is tremendous fun and the stand out star of the film. The film has some great and creepy visuals and some solidly unnerving moments.
A group of rich socialites is having a dinner party with a special treat. A powerful medium has been invited to put on a show, by opening a door to the great beyond. The group is confronted by the ghosts of their pasts, the dead come back to judge them for their sins.
He is all ears and teeth and he’s from hell! Alice is trying to find her young brother Danny in a local cave network. Instead, she runs into a mysterious stranger. Alice and Danny’s father Stan runs to the sheriff’s office when his children never return home. With the help of local Geologist Dr. Edwards, they try and find the children, only to discover a giant mutant bat creature.
Found footage movies are pretty risky really. The primary draw for filmmakers seems to be “small crew” and “can be made on the cheap”. Sometimes, this pays off. A lot of this is related to how well the filmmakers know to space out scares and when to focus on drama. Found Footage 3D knows it is entering a very full field, and as such, starts with a wink to the audience.
Christopher R. Mihm’s debut is a tale of toxic waste and teens in danger. Professor Jackson (a professor of science!) and his assistant Stephanie have come to the woods of Wisconsin to study the local frogs. Meanwhile, a group of teens is on a camping trip to celebrate graduating from high school. Unbeknownst to any of them, a local company has its employees dumping toxic chemicals into the lake.
Not to be confused with the 2001 documentary
Romero’s career as a director came with this final installment to his Dead franchise. A more traditional story structure than the previous film, this film features characters we only briefly met in Diary of the Dead. The National Guardsman are still trying to get somewhere safe. They meet a kid who tells them about an island. When they arrive at the island, they run into a rivalry between people who want to kill the zombies and those who want to protect them.
The first film was a found footage horror film about filmmakers exploring “extreme” Halloween Haunts. They stumble upon some scary folks and the film ended cryptically with the suggestion all were dead.
Earlier I commented on how the Dead movies are kind of set in an “ever present now”. Diary of the Dead kind of flips that on its head. Diary of the dead is a found footage approach to Romero’s Dead World. All told through footage from the cast of characters camera, it explores the early days of the zombie outbreak. It jumps to the beginning, and the beginning is now.
On Halloween Night some of the most vile serial killers the world has ever seen are freed from a top secret prison facility. They hide out in a funhouse and start to kill off the patrons. A group of friends attends the event, discovering they are trapped with the homicidal maniacs and try to get out alive.