What Are Little Boys Made Of? (the Omen, 1976)

the_Omen_1976_PosterThe book of 1st John 4:3 states “but every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you have heard is coming and even now is already in the world.”  A couple centuries back, the concept of pre-tribulation raptures and a singular big “A” Antichrist took hold. There was an obsession with this brand of dispensationalism in the 70’s.  There was the book the Late Great Planet Earth (which spun off a “documentary”) and a series of low budget Christian films starting with a Thief in the Night.

But Hollywood wanted in on this too. The end result is the Omen, directed by Richard Donner and starring Gregory Peck, Lee Remick, David Warner and one of the Doctors.

Robert and Katherine Thorne are grieving over their stillborn child when a priest offers the opportunity to bring home an infant whose mother died giving birth.  And so they raise the young boy named Damien as their own.  As time passes, strange events seem to surround the boy. He also behaves strangely, for instance freaking out as if in great pain as they approach a church. On his fifth birthday, everyone is shocked as his nanny publicly hangs herself.

The new nanny, who brings a large and imposing dog with her, is seemingly a bit odd. Robert is approached by individuals who claim his son is part of ancient prophecy. They hope to stop the rise of the Antichrist and are convinced it is young Damien. I mean, he is, because that is what the movie is about.

Peck brings an air of serious authority, which helps ground the film. There are some really effective bits, such as a photographer who notices a patter in certain anomalies of photos he has taken.

The film embraces the subject matter without any embarrassment. They are not worried about viewers thinking it is silly, and the performances give the story weight. The music by Jerry Goldsmith is quite iconic with it’s ominous church choir.

The Omen is one of the best Antichrist films, and holds up pretty well over forty years later.

 

Superman II the Remix (Superman II, The Donner Cut, 2006)

Superman-2-Donner-Cut-posterAssemble almost 30 years later, the Donner cut restores the original footage Donner shot and also uses some of the Lester material to fill in the blanks.  It was not assembled by Donner, but it had his blessing.

And in many, many ways, it improves the movie.  Gone are the weird additional powers.  Gone is the opening Eiffel Tower sequence.  Instead we have Lois trying to prove Clark Kent is Superman by jumping out a window of the Daily Planet.  Which is pretty absurd.  In a way, it is reminiscent of the Bible story where Satan tries to Tempt Jesus by suggesting if he jumps off the temple, Angels will save him.  And this is not Lois being a smart reporter, this is her doing something dumb.

The stuff that works, works very well and make this a pretty fun watch.  But some of the additions are problematic.  While the Super-Kiss to rob Lois of her memory is gone, Superman’s resolution is to fly the world backwards.  As I noted in the Review of Superman the Movie, this bit was meant to be the ending of Superman II.  As they had no ending shot by Donner, they re-use the sequence, and he reverses time to the point that the Kryptonian criminals are again trapped in the Phantom Zone once more.  But this creates all sorts of problems.  Superman is supposedly making it so the entire second film never happens.  The criminals never get loose, Clark never reveals his identity to Lois, they never visit the cafe.  Yet Clark goes back to the Cafe and beats up the trucker.  Who must have no idea why a guy he has never seen before walked in and started insulting him.  This is not Superman.

And reversing time does not mean the cycle won’t begin again, unless Superman avoids the situation that freed Zod, Ursa and Non in the first place.  End why should we have cared about any of it if Superman completely undoes everything?  So, even the Donner cut has problems.  Superman still causes a lot of destruction in his fight with his Kryptonian foes.  They still lose their powers and get kills by Superman and Lois.  I am told the novelization claims they survived…apparently they landed on pillows or something…but the novelization is not the movie.  It is pretty obvious they are dead.

So, why more entertaining and slightly less frustrating than Lester’s cut,  the Donner Cut is plenty flawed on it’s own.

Bring on the Bad Guys (Superman 2, 1980)

superman_2_posterSuperman the Movie and Superman II were filmed back to back, but director Richard Lester came in when there was friction between the Salkinds and Donner.  He threw out a lot of what Donner filmed and started over.  Remember Zod and his Cronies?  They are still floating through space in the Phantom Zone.  When Superman thwarts a terrorist plot by launching a bomb into space, they are set free and make their way to earth.

Superman 2 is often held up as a standard of great sequels and a great super-hero film.  Unfortunately, it is not.  The film has Superman (and Zod, Ursa and Non) developing random powers and weapons.  Their heat vision suddenly can be used as tractor beams, Superman’s logo can turn is a giant cellophane bag, they can shoot beams from their fingers.

Don’t get me wrong, there are some good points.  The Villains are frightening at times.  Terrance Stamp is menacing and arrogant, while Douglas plays Ursa with a disinterested flair.  She is slightly amused by earthlings, but she could never care, she lacks all compassion.

There is a story in which Lois and Clark must pose as newlyweds.  This leads to the reveal of Clark’s secret to Lois, which leads to them running off for romance.  Superman and Lois hide away in the Fortress of Solitude, completely unaware of the arrival of the Kryptonian criminals.  Superman realizes that to be with Lois, he must give up his power.  He consults with his Mother Lara (well, a hologram of her and she shows him a machine that will bath him in the light of a red sun and make him human.  You can see where this is going.  When Lois and Clark start to make their way home, Clark tries to defend Lois at a cafe.  A trucker beats the crap out of him.  This moment is actually really well handled, Reeve really sells Clark’s startling realization that he is no longer the strongest man alive.  But then Clark learns of Zod.

So, Superman’s human life is a short lived one.  Even though the Fortress was damaged and he was told the process was irreversible… Clark gets his powers back off screen.  This leads to a dramatic fight in the city.  You know, for all the criticism Man of Steel gets for it’s destruction, Superman II has Superman carelessly throwing the criminals through building, the character beating each other into the ground and so on.  There is little concern for the city.

One of the other good points is the duplicitous nature of Lex Luthor.  Towards the beginning he breaks out of prison and then runs off to the Fortress of Solitude.  He starts listening to the information from Lara…considering Lara can hold conversations with Superman, I am not sure why she cannot react to Lex.   Luthor helps the Kryptonians attempt to take over the world (they promise to give him Australia).  But when things look tough, he is quick to side with Superman (for Survival).

One of the big problems is the film has a Superkiss that robs Lois of her memories of who Superman is…and he also goes back to the cafe to humiliate the trucker.  This is not Superman.  And his character is tarnished for a joke.  Superman II does not hold up, and is actually a weaker film than it’s predecessor.  And more recent Super-hero films are vastly superior.

Young Superman(Superman the Movie, 1978)

Superman_Movie_PosterRichard Donner’s Superman is often presented as a more upbeat and hopeful film than more recent Superhero efforts.  And, in a lot of ways, it is a brighter view overall.  Donner opens the film with life on Krypton.  His version of Krypton has influenced countless versions of Superman.  It became a ruling vision.  And I get it…it is a society and world at it’s end.  But the severely antiseptic frozen tundra look is actually unpleasant and does not really speak of an advanced society.  Jor-El is introduced presiding over the trial of General Zod and his army.  Well, him, Ursa and Non.  Not really an army.  What stands out was that in the middle of this trial, Zod tries to convince Jor-El to join him.  And then they are zapped by a giant reflective record sleeve.  Then, they never appear in the rest of the film.

Jor-El declare the planet is soon to die and is mocked by his fellow scientists who make him commit to staying on the planet.  We all know the story, found by the Kents, young Kal El is raised as a typical Kansas kid.  These moments are great.  They show the thought the Kents have tried to install in their son.    Clark’s struggle to not use his powers for only his gain is evident.  Clark wants to be the football star and get dates with cheerleaders.  But he also knows it would be a cheat to use his powers to succeed in that fashion.  And when Pa Kent dies?  Glenn Ford is barely on screen for any meaningful amount of time…and yet it is a real gut punch.

The Fortress of Solitude used to be a giant cave with a giant door.  Now it is a spiky crystal building with no doors.  Here he learns from holograms of his father.  When he enters the world, he is ready to be Superman.  One of the things Donner did right is that he fills the film with Superman…an it is Superman saving people over and over again.  Sure, he stops crime as well, but saving people is his main gig.

Lois Lane is shown as a tough reporter (who cannot spell) who has little notice of new Reporter Clark Kent, but then swoons when Superman appears on the screen.  This is not a negative, for one thing, she still follows her instincts when Superman shows up for an interview, clearly smitten with her.  Kidder and Reeve have terrific chemistry in the film and Lois is fun and daring.

We are introduced to Lex Luthor via his bumbling lackey Otis.  Ned Beatty is entertaining, though a bit over the top in his mindlessness.  Hackman’s Luthor is a change from the comics of the time.  He is still brilliant, but instead of super armor, he is simply a criminal mastermind.  It is a bit over the top, but Hackman makes it work.  The third spoke in the wheel is Valerie Perrine’s Miss Tessmacher.  I am unsure exactly what her purpose is.  I mean, Perrine is undeniably sexy in the role and appears in a variety of revealing outfits.  But she seems distant for a girlfriend, and yet a lot of what she does is lounge around.  She does play the role of “distraction”in part of Luthor’s plan.  Oh, and that plan…

Luthor is planning to make a land grab…this becomes a running thing for him in the movies.  He plans to blow California off the map and sell land.  I do not see how this really would be an effective plan.  Seriously, the guy who stole two missiles from the army and used them to blow up a sizeable chunk of land is going to be able to own and sell land?

Superman is a pretty fun movie with a really impressive cast.  The weakest moment is the weird “Superman spins the earth to Fix Things.  This was actually meant for the sequel, which Donner was already filming alongside this film.  But the studio wanted him to use it to give this a big bang of an ending.

But all in all, Superman the Movie is a fun film for kids of all ages.

 

What a Scrooge Part 8 (Scrooged, 1988)

 In 1988, Richard Donner and Bill Murray brought us a totally reinvented the tale in a modern setting. They kept the main idea, but found a new way to express it. Scrooged focuses on Frank Cross, a self centered, egotistical, power hungry uh…narcissist. He has no concern for his hard working assistant, his long suffering but loving brother or his earnest employees. It’s all about power and ratings. When he airs a dark add to promote his network’s live presentation of “Scrooge”, one employee (a surprisingly sympathetic Bobcat Goldthwait) suggests he should not air it. Frank plays sympathetic, but as Eliot leaves, Frank calls security and has him fired (the film heaps tragedy on Eliot something fierce).

While going through a gift list, he has his assistant send his brother a towel (the other option is a VCR-which goes to the “important” people on the list). That night Frank is stunned by a visit from his old boss who died seven years before, Lew Hayward (Played by John Forsythe). Lew is a big departure from Marley, oh, he’s tortured with a wicked streak, but there are no chains, rather a decayed body (with a mouse!).

He warns Frank of a visit from three ghosts. Unlike the traditional tale we know so well, this story takes place in the waking hours, causing Frank all sorts of embarrassment navigating from his adventures with the ghosts to the real world.

Add the stress of a younger power hungry narcissist (Brice Cummings, played by one of my favorite actors, John Glover) and pressure of a live show, and that puts Cross near the edge. The real brilliance of Scrooge is the three Ghosts.

Former New York Doll member David Johansen plays the Ghost of Christmas Past. He is a witty, sarcastic cigar chomping elfin cabbie. He loves to trip up Frank and clearly thinks Cross is to undeserving of the good things from his past. We see that as a child, Frank’s home was a bleak one. On Christmas Eve, the Cross household is the only one lacking a Christmas theme. Frank’s Father (played by Bill’s brother Brian) is bitter and cold towards his family. A butcher, he gives his son some veal, and heartlessly ridicules four year old Frankie who had hoped for a “choo choo”. They jump ahead to Frank’s early career and also his intro to the love of his life, Claire (Karen Allen) in a cute little sequence, and then we get to see a year later, another Christmas which shows how happy Frank was with Claire. And then we see his misstep. He is so determined to further his career, he pushes Claire away. When invited to dinner with the president of the network (Lew) he is ready to brush off plans he and Claire have. When the Ghost points out that he was crazy, of course, Frank gets defensive, noting that sure, maybe he has made a mistake or two. But he’s not as clueless as the Ghost believes.

Frank goes to locate Claire for emotional support/help. He finds her running a homeless shelter/soup kitchen. Three homeless people join him, and all seem short a few pennies. They believe Cross to be Richard Burton. After pretending to be Burton, he is found by Claire, who offers help, but also has to take care of some things at the shelter. Frustrated, Frank tells Claire to not bother, and offers the advice to get rid of the freeloaders. Scrape em’ off. It a nice echo of the original story when Scrooge is approached by men seeking help for charity.

The pixie like Carol Kane gleefully plays the Ghost of Christmas Present…and she’s quite a little sadist, getting Frank from location to location with copious amounts of physical abuse. She takes him to his assistant’s house (played by Alfre Woodard) where he discovers minor facts like her youngest son doesn’t speak and it’s due to seeing his father killed. This comes as a shock to Frank. “Grace’s husband died?” He believed the year she was wearing black was just a fashion thing. They visit his brother (Played by Real life brother John Murray) and his wife (Wendy Malick), allowing Frank to see how much his brother cares for him.

While one might doubt the love of Frank’s father, the love and adoration of his brother is never in doubt. In a nice play off of the original Dickens story, Frank gets to eves drop on a TV Trivia game (which has a cute payoff in the end). Frank is left by the Ghost in the sewers of New York. There he discovers one of the homeless bums he brushed off, Herman. Frank finds himself frustrated by Herman’s death…angry at himself, at Herman…

Frank once again finds himself stumbling through his set, disrupting things once again. Frank is shuffled off by Brice to his office, under the guise of concern from Frank’s mental well being (it becomes increasingly clear that Brice is after Cross’ job). While resting at his desk, we see the immense Ghost of Christmas Future appearing on the bank of TV screens behind him. Suddenly, in bursts Eliot, who is clearly drunk and has a shotgun in hand, interrupting the Ghost, who backs off. After being chased through the office by Eliot, Cross attempts to get away by ducking into an elevator. There he finds himself face to face with the Ghost. I should note, of all the presentations of the Ghost of Christmas Future, this is my favorite. The Ghost is already haunting because you see little of its face. And it never utters a word (In any variation of the story). But Donner and his team create a unique look, built on the classic “Hooded Ghost”.

You see inside the cloak, but the head is a TV screen. And it has jarring images, jumping images. Often you see flashes of Frank in the screen. In one neat moment, Frank is looking up at the Ghost and you see Frank from the Ghost’s perspective. The images are, again mirrors of the original Dickens’s tale. In one genius moment however, Frank’s words are harshly thrown back at him by, not one of the Ghosts, but rather a future vision of Claire. She has some hungry kids chased away. She is clearly upper crust now. When her friends suggest she is being too harsh, she boldly proclaims that she wasted years on people like those children. “Thankfully” a friend set her straight. Cross becomes very sullen, seeing what his words have done.

He quietly turns to the Ghost, commenting “That was a lousy thing to do” (There are moments in the film that seem to foreshadow Murray’s later roles from films like Broken Flowers or Lost In Translation). Of course, the Ghost shows him his inevitable fate. Frank sees the only people to show were his younger brother and his wife. In a rather frightening sequence, Frank finds himself trapped in his coffin, being sent to cremation.

Frank comes to back in the office. He joyfully overpowers Eliot, and starts to apologize and offers a better pay and a nicer office. And he needs Eliot’s help. This leads to a lengthy speech from Cross on National TV, in which he confesses his failures and screams to the heavens of his newfound spirit. This also opens the door to reconciliation for him as people stare in stunned awe as a Frank they have never seen apologizes to friends, family and co-workers and makes promises of a newfound hope. It’s a sequence that skirts the fine lines of schmaltz and touching.

Murray as the stand in for Ebenezer brings that dry wit that only he has. Frankly, I can’t think of many actors who could have played this role with out leaning either to much into the comedy or being over dramatic. As I mentioned, there are hints of the quieter, more sublime Bill Murray we’ve seen in more recent years, though clearly still the Bill Murray of Ghostbusters. The Ghosts are clever and fresh takes on the original classic motif. In fact, Past and Present are pretty much complete revisionist ideas. I found the use of “Put a Little Love In Your Heart” as an interesting switch from relying on a holiday standard.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑