The Hunter or the Hunted? Pt 4 (Alien Resurrection, 1997)

Alien_Resurrection_PosterIn spite of a lukewarm reception to the third film, the studio wanted to take another try at the Alien Franchise.  Although they managed to pump this one out in just three years, it is a bigger mess than the last one.

This film is set around two hundred years after the last one.  It establishes a new wrinkle in the xenomorph mythology.  Not only do they borrow from their host, they seem to share DNA.  Scientists clone Ripley and the clone has an alien queen in her chest.

A ship of space pirates arrives at the military base that has cloned Ripley with top secret cargo.  The scientists are trying to control the aliens as possible weapons.  You know how that will work out.  The aliens break free and take over the installation, leaving Ripley (along with the Space Pirates) to try and escape.

The film tries to explore the ethics and horrors of genetic experimentation.  There is a nicely played moment where they discover a lab full of less successful Ripley clones.  One is still alive, causing Ripley true horror.  The film has Ripley’s humanity in question (her blood has acidic qualities like the xenomorph) which is punctuated by a late reveal of a synthetic person.  The film also tries to add a new breed of alien, but it looks absolutely hideous.  Giving the alien beady eyes, white skin and a pot belly is not frightening, just an awful design.

The practical effects are, as they have been throughout the franchise, strong and effective.  However, the digital aliens do not stand up well twenty years later.

In spite of a strong cast (not to mention script doctor work by Joss Whedon) the story feels rather pedestrian.  Nothing quite gels into a cohesive narrative, and seems like it was built on a series of “wouldn’t it be cool if…” meetings.

The Hunter or the Hunted, Pt 3 (Alien 3, 1992)

Alien_3_PosterThe success of Aliens had the studio rushing to try and get an Alien 3 going.  There were a lot of false starts and bad ideas that led to what we got.  Good scripts got tossed aside for weird ideas.  There were questions on whether Weaver wanted to return.  While she did finally return, she pushed for this to be the end of Ripley’s journey.

Music video director David Fincher was given the job of bringing the film to life.  It should be noted, Fincher was deeply unhappy with his experience and even producers admit they treated him very badly.  Which is unfortunate.  Because the end result was a muddled and overall messy film with some good ideas and some terrible choices.

After the events of Aliens, Ripley, Newt, Hick and Bishop are in hypersleep on a small escape pod.  There is a malfunction that results in the ship crashing on a small prison planet.  Only Ripley survives.  The prison operates on a skeleton crew, primarily made up of the inmates.  Most have adopted a form of Christianity that sees themselves as so unable to resist the draw of sin, living on a planet without temptations is their only choice.  As religious leader  Dillon (Charles S. Dutton) notes, Ripley’s arrival has put temptations back in place.

An alien facehugger has escaped with Ripley and finds a host.  This film added a new twist to the series.  It suggested that the alien xenomorph actually borrows traits from it’s host.  In this case it is a dog.  This results in a xenomorph that runs around on all fours and is more canine in it’s movement.

Once the xenomorph is discovered, Ripley and the inmates struggle to defeat it.  Alien 3 is an attempt at not repeating the previous films.  So they drop Ripley on a planet with no weapons.  Unfortunately, a lot of the decisions with the script resulted in nullifying the progress of Ripley in Aliens.  Killing her defacto family put her back at square one.    The studio interference left us with a film disowned by it’s director and far more to weaken it.  The strengths are few and far between.  The religious aspect is kind of interesting and the cast is terrific.  Yet these things cannot save a slapped together script and poor CGI.

The Hunter or the Hunted? Pt 2 (Aliens, 1986)

Aliens_PosterAbout seven years after Alien, hotshot director James Cameron brought the franchise roaring back to life.  Rather than make a generic sequel, Cameron made a bold choice.  The first film was a haunted house movie, Cameron opted to make a war movie.

Ripley is awakened 50 years after the first film to find everything she knew is gone.  On top of that she is plagued by nightmares of the alien creature.  Ripley joins a mission at the request of the corporation to check on a colony that is on the same planet they found the eggs with the alien xenomorph.  It is promised to Ripley this is a search and destroy mission.

She is joined by a platoon of Space Marines.  They don’t believe her claims of an alien monster, but of course, they soon find out she is neither crazy nor a liar.  And then things get bad.  And then?  They get worse.

Aliens is one of those rare sequels that manages to rival it’s predecessor.  Ripley is angry and aimless at the film’s beginning.  When she discovers a young girl named Newt hiding in the remains of the colony she starts to see beyond merely destroying the aliens.  In the extended cut of the film, it is revealed that Ripley had a daughter on earth who grew up and died in the time Ripley floated through space.  This gives an added dimension to Ripley and her dedication to Newt throughout the film.

The marines are a hearty and confident lot.  Their banter feels natural as they trade insults and yet fight to protect each other when it all comes crashing down.  They are a compelling group.  And then there is Bishop.  A synthetic or android, Ripley does not trust him, due to the fact that the android on her ship tried to murder her.  Bishop represents the other side of that coin.  He is kind and polite.  He is also willing to risk himself.  At one point, after volunteering for a risky mission he states, “Believe me, I’d prefer not to. I may be synthetic, but I’m not stupid.”  How much of this is programming that compels him, versus a certain human quality is unclear.  He notes his programming prevents him from causing harm to a person, but does that programming extend to risking himself to save a person from outside threat?

This is a near perfect action film, with thrills and twists and turns.  It manages to expand upon the mythology of the first film’s animal without being a tired retread of information.  The performances are compelling and the visual effects have withstood the test of time.  On top of that, in spite of being a sequel, you could go into Aliens never having seen Ridley Scott’s film and follow the story with few, if any, questions.

 

The Hunter or The Hunted? Pt 1 (Alien, 1979)

Alien_PosterAlien begins rather quietly.  We see the interiors of a ship that is floating through space.  It comes to life and we meet a crew…space truckers, so to speak.  We do not know much about what they are hauling, though it does not matter much.  We get that these are working class joes.  This is not Star Trek.  The ship has awakened the crew due to a distress message.

Going down to the planet, one of the crew members  is attacked by a strange creature that attaches to his face.  And so begins a terrifying trip for the crew as they try to eliminate the alien creature that evolves to become a greater and greater threat.

Alien is a expertly crafted “haunted house in space” tale.  The ship is vast, yet it has a confined and claustrophobic feel.  The design of the sets is that of a blue collar environment.  It feels used, run down.  It is an industrial, a utilitarian styled ship.  It was assembled for it’s purpose, not it’s beauty.

The alien ship is unique and feels remarkably unearthly.  The pilot, long petrified is inhuman and ominous.

Then there are the designs of the creature itself.  The work of famed artist H.R. Geiger, the alien (later dubbed the xenomorph in the series) feels uniquely creepy and unearthly.  A hard shell, with acid for blood, it seems to exist only to destroy.

The cast  is terrific as weary workers just trying to get by, but being forced to deal with something beyond their pay grade.  Sigourney Weaver’s Ellen Ripley steps up to the plate to lead the fight after the crew takes some losses.  At this point the game becomes more one of cat and mouse.

Alien is a film full of surprises and character and manages to stand up to repeated viewings.  It has become a classic for good reason.

Wedding Crashing (Mike and Dave Need Wedding Dates, 2016)

mike_and_dave_posterMike and Dave are brothers who party hard…so hard that their family is frustrated at how they ruin every even.  To be allowed at their sister’s wedding, they are required to bring respectable dates.  Mike and Dave get the idea to go on TV and put the call out to get some classy ladies.  Alice and Tatiana are lazy who cannot hold a job, in part because they would rather lay around smoking weed.  They see Mike and Dave and decide to con their way into a free Hawaiian vacation on Mike and Dave’s dime.  Crazy adventures follow.

Well, more like “Standard Comedy Misadventures.”  As you might suspect, the ruse is discovered, things fall apart and then the leads must fix their screw up.  It is a pretty standard trope.  The problem for this film is nothing distracts you from the highly predictable beats.

Most of the characters are very loose sketches.  And while I suspect it is intentional, Adam Levine’s Mike is far less sympathetic than Efron as Dave.  This is mirrored in Plaza’s Tatiana and Anna Kendrick’s Alice.  But that ends up working against the film.  While there are funny points, nothing makes the movie stand out.  It is trying to be in the vein of Wedding Crashers, but feels like a film trying real hard to look like it is pushing envelopes…but even those moments feel heavily cliched.

The film had a lot of potentials, as it has an excellent comedic cast.  I went in hoping to really enjoy this film as some crazy farce.  Instead, I found long stretches where the film comes to a standstill.   At barely over an hour and a half, this is not a good thing.

In the end, Mike and Dave Need Wedding Dates is a derivative comedy that is mildly amusing…but I suspect will largely be forgotten.

The Gift of Music (Popstar: Never Stop Never Stopping, 2016)

popstar_posterI confess, for several years I was pretty lukewarm on Andy Samberg.  I recall not finding Hot Rod all that funny.  Over the years, I have been convinced I was wrong about Samberg.  Especially with his hilarious performance as Detective Jake Peralta on Brooklyn 9-9 (easily one of my favorite comedies from the past few years).  In fact, I am thinking of revisiting Hot Rod to see if my feelings on that film have changed.

I was unsure about Popstar, because while the trailers did look funny, I worried it would be unable to sustain the gag.  Popstar is about popular pop artist Conner.  Conner is from a popular boy band Style Boyz.  He went solo and was propelled to even greater success, while his bandmates had…less success.

His second album is a critical and sales failure.  He attempts to sustain his career as incident after incident makes it clear his is crashing and burning severely.  While Popstar: Never Stop Never Stopping is not a wholly original idea, it is well crafted.  Samberg and writer/directors Akiva Schaffer and Jorma Taccone have packed the film so tightly with jokes, it overcomes the fairly pedestrian plot.

Samberg’s very clueless and shallow Conner somehow manages to still be likable.  And this is where the movie shines.  Its satire of the world of entertainment is simple but effective.  The film could have overstayed it’s welcome, but they clearly knew when to cut a gag or scene that was unnecessary.  Just under an hour and a half, Popstar: Never Stop Never Stopping has a high rate of jokes that hit their mark.  I was laughing throughout the film.

Samberg is supported by a strong cast of comedy veterans, such as Tim Meadows (who seems to have comfortably slid into the straight man role) as Conner’s hard working manager.  Chris Redd is very funny as Hunter, a rapper on the rise that is opening for Conner’s shows(he tells Conner, “I wanna be you, kind of, but not white. Like black still, ’cause it’s strong. It’s a strong color.”) and then starts to overshadow Conner.

Popstar was an unexpected comedy pleasure for me, delivers a load of laughter.

The Mother Daughter Bond (Snatched, 2017)

snatched_posterWhen I first saw announcements for the Amy Schumer and Goldie Hawn vehicle Snatched…I cringed.  Kidnapping for laughs is kind of a weird one.  And one that has been pretty done to death.  Kidnapping for comedy films are, of course, very divorced from the realities of the crime of kidnapping.  And some are better than others.

So, I walked into this film a bit hesitant.  I had certainly laughed at bits in trailers, and I like Hawn and Schumer.  Thankfully, for me the film worked pretty well.  A lot of the weight for this falls on Schumer and Hawn, with some terrific backup by Wanda Sykes and (an entirely silent) Joan Cusack.

Goldie has a long career in comedy and knows her trade.  This is a real benefit for Schumer since they have a nice chemistry together.  Schumer is basically playing a common character for her.  The aimless and awkward loser.  Hawn plays her over protective and cat loving mother.

Emily (Schumer) gets dumped by her boyfriend (an entertaining but brief appearance by Fresh Off the Boat’s Randall Park) and drags her mother along with her on a non-refundable trip to Ecuador.  Once there, they become tricked by a handsome stranger who delivers them to kidnappers who plan to ransom them.  What follows is Emily and her mother on the run from a vicious Ecuadorian warlord and trying to get to the nearest American Embassy.

As noted, Schumer and Hawn have a good chemistry, and the film is populated by great character actors.  The jokes often hit their target and are entertaining enough to not be distracted by a pretty conventional story about parent and child realizing how much they love each other.

Also, it was really nice watching a comedy and not getting bored because scenes went on to long.  Seriously, the most common complaint I hear people make about comedies is “Should have been a half an hour shorter.”  Snatched does not overstay it’s welcome, clocking in at a nice hour and a half.

Snatched does not break any new comedy ground, but it was a fun film with a good cast and funny jokes.

Why Ask Why? (Why Him, 2016)

why_him_posterWritten and Directed by Josh Hamburg (most notably the writer of all three Meet the Parents films) addresses a discussion a friend and I were having recently.  We were talking about films having familiar plots.  My take on this is that I do not generally care if a film has a plot point we “have seen before”. If it does it well?  I am not going to be annoyed by it.  There are only so many plots, and I cannot think of many films that told a tale that has previously unseen elements.  But there is a flip side to this.  A story that follows all the familiar points like a rigid map?  Rarely is it done well.

Which brings us to Why Him.  Like many comedies before it, we are treated to a tale of parents meeting their potential son-in-law and the resulting calamity.  Going in?  I wanted to like this film…almost desperately.  I mean, Bryan Cranston has proven himself as an actor almost always worth watching.  And both Megan Mullally and Keegan-Michael Key are gifted comedic performers.  James Franco is…well he plays some exaggerated form of James Franco in almost any film he is in…and this film is not much of a change there.

It feels like the film is trying very hard to seem unpredictable and edgy.  And yet it follows the rules of family conflict comedies so steadfastly that there is not doubt where the film is going to end.  You see it all coming from miles away.  There is no point where Why Him swerves right when you expected it to swerve left.

Are there times where I was amused?  I guess.  Were there any times where the movie surprised me…not a one.  This is not a smartly made dumb comedy.  This is an uninspired dumb comedy.

Father-Son Bonding (Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 2, 2017)

guardians_vol_2_posterGuardians of the Galaxy was a bit of a risk for Marvel Studios.  It was really their first film that had little name recognition.  It also was their first film not closely tied to the Avengers.  And yet, under the guidance of James Gunn, Guardians of the Galaxy succeeded with a healthy dose of humor and action.  Towards the end of the film, Yondu mentions knowing who Starlord’s father is.  In this sequel, we meet dear old dad.

While fighting an inter-dimensional beast, Rocket steals some batteries from the Sovereign.  This results in a chase through space that culminates in Starlord meeting his father Ego. Ego is a “living” planet.  He has a human avatar who sired Starlord.  In the meantime, they are being hunted by Yondu and the Ravagers to collect a bounty for the Guardian set by the Sovereign.

Volume 2 carries forward with the same tone and attitude of the first film, making it a lot of fun to watch.  The opening credits are a blast to watch.  Easily one of the best opening sequences for a comic book film.  The cast has really come together and it shows in their performances.

The new cast adds to the fun, with Kurt Russell being a high point for…well being Kurt Russell.  He is one of those actors you hire because you want a “type” that is specific to a particular actor.  Call it the Goldblum Effect if you will.  You hire Jeff Goldblum for a movie because you want a “Jeff Goldblum Type”.

In addition, Sylvester Stallone, Ving Rhames and Michelle Yoeh have small but pivotal roles (obviously setting up Volume 3).  The film is full of blink and you might miss it fan service, but with James Gunn, it is not distracting (for the most part) and for people unfamiliar with the comics will be unnoticed.

Of course, the soundtrack is integral to this film, each song clearly chosen carefully by Gunn.  Marvel was wise to stick with Gunn for the Guardians brand because he has a very specific vision that allows these films to stand out from the Marvel Pack.

A lot of the humor this time around is coming from Drax (Dave Bautista) and Baby Groot. Some of the more surprising emotion comes from Michael Rooker’s Yondu.

Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 2 can be pretty intense and it is not really for young kids.  But teens and adults alike will find a lot to enjoy here.  Personally, I found Volume 2 to be a very fun film-going experience and find myself anticipating the next outing.

Oh, and by the way…there are five mid to post credit scenes.  So do not get up and head for the door right away.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑