The Bigger They Come Part 9 (King Kong, 1976)

king_kong_1976_PosterIn 1976, we saw the first King Kong Remake.  Producer Dino De Laurentiis had this made amid legal hassles over who actually owned the rights to King Kong.  The setting is moved to the 1970’s and it is a new batch of characters.  Fred Wilson is an oil executive trying to reach the newly discovered Skull Island.  He is certain it will be a treasure trove of fossil fuels.  Jack Prescott is a primate paleontologist  who stows away.  He ends up being used as the staff photographer.  Finally, the freighter comes upon a raft with the unconscious Dwan, a beautiful young blonde.

The motives are different, but the results are the same.  The team discovers a giant wall (a surprise as it was assumed that the island had no native peoples).  The native chief is enthralled by Dwan and tries to trade girls for her.  They later kidnap Dwan  and offer her up to Kong.  Jack leads a team to save her, and then Fred decides to bring capture Kong.  It follows the original story pretty closely here (though substituting the World Trade Center for the Empire State Building).

One of the biggest changes is how Kong is a lot less sympathetic.  He is a bit of a creep, at one point practically molesting Dwan.  Fred Wilson is not like Carl Denham.  Denham was an obsessed dreamer as well as an opportunist.  Fred is simply a man of great greed.

The remake starts out serious, gets very campy and then ends with an attempt at being “powerfully dramatic”.

Of all the versions of the Kong story, this take on Skull Island is the dullest.  It has few creatures and there is little sense of danger.

Kong is clearly a guy in a suit, especially noticeable when he walks.  But the mechanics of the gorilla head are actually quite effective.  The face is especially effective.

Overall, the 1976 remake is a dud, in spite of a fairly strong cast.

Starting Over (The Stepfather, 2009)

stepfather_remake_posterThis is a pretty slick and glossy remake.  It begins much like the original, right down to the Stepfather clearing a fogged up mirror and shaving off a bushy beard.  It is a little extended, but the idea is the same.  Admittedly, it was a pretty iconic moment, and I get wanting to use it again.

In his new town he meets Sela Ward’s Susan.  She has three children, one of whom is in military school (Michael, played by Penn Badgley).  He returns six months after his mom and David (the Stepfather) met and they are already engaged.  Michael instantly does not trust David.  David tries to get him to trust him with a private conversation about they will heal the family together (over shots).

The film establishes that his back story is that his wife and daughter were killed in an accident by a drunk driver.  And quickly, he starts to slip up, confusing names of his dead daughter while talking to Michael.

Unlike the first film, David needs to fix his problems very quickly.  A little old lady in the neighborhood told everyone about how this police sketch of the family killer she saw on a TV show looked just like David.  So, of course he has to kill her.  Susan’s ex-husband gets inquisitive.  So, He has to die.  The film tends to take it’s kill count from the third Stepfather films, going for big numbers, rather than a nuanced exploration of the Stepfather’s psychosis.

The Stepfather of this remake is kind of confusing.  The original films he was a very strict traditionalist.  He believed in hardcore moral values.  He did not believe in sex before marriage or living together before marriage.  His rigid morality was a code he lived by and refused to falter on.  When he did falter, that is when he started to crack.  This version sees a guy who is accused of being to old fashioned, but he seems to have pretty modern attitudes.  He lives with Susan and her kids, they are having sex.  In a scene reminiscent of the original, Michael puts on headphones to drown out the sounds of sex.  In the 1987 version, part of what makes the scene work is when we see O’Quinn and Hack together, O’Quinn has an expression of wanting to be anywhere but there having sex.

Anytime Amber Heard is on the screen, it feels like the director forgot he was making a movie…the film lingers on Heard in a bikini a lot…I mean, it is necessary I am sure…because Michael is a swimmer, so they spend a ton of by the pool.  I get it, Heard is attractive…but it is just s obvious that it distracts from the film.  It seems to have been distracting enough that we meet some detectives at the beginning working the case.  And we never see them again.

Sure, this film is far more action picked, with a big fight, but everything that is no really does not add to the story, everything that links back to the original just feels like a pale imitation.  While it is certainly better that Stepfather 3, this remake does nothing to improve on the original.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑